API Wars

As technology evolves, software copyright laws become fuzzy and open to interpretation. This year we’ll see the Supreme Court review the legal status of a copyright dispute related to Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) between Oracle and Google. Previously the ruling was in favour of Oracle, who accused Google of infringing the copyright of the Java API, for its reimplementation in the Android OS.

An API is “a set of functions and procedures allowing the creation of applications that access the features or data of an operating system, application, or other service”. In other words, APIs are about creating interaction and connecting things that were not previously connected. Successful APIs foster fruitful communities which bring the underlying technology one step further, by creating useful derived works or by (re)implementing it in novel ways. Most software companies try to make their products more open and easy to integrate and use with other products. This usually increases the adoption rate, the overall popularity, and appreciation for the product. This type of openness is meant to build bridges between companies and encourage partnerships.

At the end of the day, we all want to make money. Whereas some are in the business of building bridges others seem to profit more by building walls. The world is divided like that. Being all alone and surrounded by high walls can make you vulnerable to scrutiny. As a consequence of their own actions, Oracle is now accused of copying Amazon’s S3 API. Of course, different shades of grey come to light when you find yourself accused of a crime you previously reported. Oracle has argued that using an API is not related to reimplementation disqualifying it as an infringement of copyright.

API copyright wars could create a legal minefield of gotchas. This generates confusion and spreads fear amongst consumers. Sure, you should always ask for permission to use an API, but giving companies monopoly power over the competition by means of copyright law defies the purpose of the law itself. Let us not forget that these laws are made to protect the creator from abuse and not to empower the creator to abuse.

Posted in ,


[ ES ] Licenseware entra en alianza estratégica con Proactivanet

By Licenseware | March 4, 2024 |

W08-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | February 29, 2024 | Comments Off on W08-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W07-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Licenseware | February 22, 2024 | Comments Off on W07-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W06-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | February 12, 2024 | Comments Off on W06-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

How to assess your Java licensing, a short guide.

By Licenseware | February 5, 2024 |

W05-24 SAM & ITAM

By Licenseware | February 5, 2024 | Comments Off on W05-24 SAM & ITAM

W04-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | January 30, 2024 | Comments Off on W04-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W03-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | January 22, 2024 | Comments Off on W03-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

W02-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

By Alex Cojocaru | January 15, 2024 | Comments Off on W02-24 SAM & ITAM Jobs

Navigating the Cloud Cost Paradox in IT Asset Management

By Licenseware | January 10, 2024 | Comments Off on Navigating the Cloud Cost Paradox in IT Asset Management